Better Homes Depot, Inc. v. Kraut

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Better Homes Depot, Inc. v. Kraut

282 A.D.2d 637, 723 N.Y.S.2d 679, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3971

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 23, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 282 A.D.2d 637 (Better Homes Depot, Inc. v. Kraut) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Better Homes Depot, Inc. v. Kraut, 282 A.D.2d 637, 723 N.Y.S.2d 679, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3971 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to modify a judgment of foreclosure and sale entered November 17, 1998, in an action entitled Avco Mtge. Servs., Inc. v Radiance W. Morter, 56 Fairview Realty Corp., pending in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, under Index No. 98-04647, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered March 9, 2000, which granted the cross motion of the defendant Avco Mortgage Services, Inc., pursuant to CPLR 3211, to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and denied, as academic, its motion, inter alia, for preliminary injunctive relief.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record demonstrates that the plaintiff, an experienced purchaser of foreclosed properties, had notice that the property at issue was being sold subject to the payment by the purchaser of any unpaid taxes, liens, or encumbrances. Having proceeded with the purchase under those terms, the plaintiff cannot now claim that the judgment of foreclosure and sale should be modified to eliminate that obligation (see, Federal Natl. Mtge. Assn. v Nittoli, 250 AD2d 427; cf., RPAPL 1354 [2]). Bracken, P. J., Ritter, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to modify a judgment of foreclosure and sale entered November 17, 1998, in an action entitled Avco Mtge. Servs., Inc. v Radiance W. Morter, 56 Fairview Realty Corp., pending in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, under Index No. 98-04647, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered March 9, 2000, which granted the cross motion of the defendant Avco Mortgage Services, Inc., pursuant to CPLR 3211, to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and denied, as academic, its motion, inter alia, for preliminary injunctive relief.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record demonstrates that the plaintiff, an experienced purchaser of foreclosed properties, had notice that the property at issue was being sold subject to the payment by the purchaser of any unpaid taxes, liens, or encumbrances. Having proceeded with the purchase under those terms, the plaintiff cannot now claim that the judgment of foreclosure and sale should be modified to eliminate that obligation (see, Federal Natl. Mtge. Assn. v Nittoli, 250 AD2d 427; cf., RPAPL 1354 [2]). Bracken, P. J., Ritter, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D.2d 637, 723 N.Y.S.2d 679, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/better-homes-depot-inc-v-kraut-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack