Better Construction, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

528 So. 2d 31, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2333, 1988 WL 56520
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 7, 1988·No. No. 87-707·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined each of the points presented on appeal and cross-appeal and find that the trial judge committed no error. Nodar v. Galbreath, 462 So.2d 803 (Fla.1984); New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Utility Battery Mfg. Co., 122 Fla. 718, 166 So. 856 (1935); U.S. Home Corp. v. Suncoast Utils., Inc., 454 So.2d 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Mori v. Matsushita Elec. Corp., 380 So.2d 461, 463 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), cert. denied, 389 So.2d 1112 (Fla.1980); Sobel v. Jefferson Stores, Inc., 459 So.2d 433 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Better Construction, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 528 So. 2d 31, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2333, 1988 WL 56520 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

528 So. 2d 31 (Better Construction, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniel Intern. Corp. v. Better Const., Inc.
593 So. 2d 524 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)