Bettencourt v. State

California Supreme Court

Bettencourt v. State

19 Cal. 2d 876

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 4, 1942

DocketS. F. No. 16036

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Cal. 2d 876 (Bettencourt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bettencourt v. State, 19 Cal. 2d 876 (Cal. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

CARTER, J. —

This is one of several appeals from judgments entered in actions for damages arising out of highway construction work. In each instance, the facts are substantially the same, although the extent of the injury varies.

[877]*877The amount awarded for damage in this particular ease was the sum of $3,500. All material legal points here presented are disposed of in a decision this day filed in the case of Rose v. State of California, No. 16040, ante, p. 713 [123 Pac. (2d) 505]. Upon the grounds and for the reasons there given, the judgment herein is affirmed.

Shenk, J., Curtis, J., and Houser, J., concurred.

Appellant’s petition for a rehearing was denied April 2, 1942. Gibson, C. J., Edmonds, J., and Traynor, J., voted for a rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CARTER, J. —

This is one of several appeals from judgments entered in actions for damages arising out of highway construction work. In each instance, the facts are substantially the same, although the extent of the injury varies.

[877]*877The amount awarded for damage in this particular ease was the sum of $3,500. All material legal points here presented are disposed of in a decision this day filed in the case of Rose v. State of California, No. 16040, ante, p. 713 [123 Pac. (2d) 505]. Upon the grounds and for the reasons there given, the judgment herein is affirmed.

Shenk, J., Curtis, J., and Houser, J., concurred.

Appellant’s petition for a rehearing was denied April 2, 1942. Gibson, C. J., Edmonds, J., and Traynor, J., voted for a rehearing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Cal. 2d 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bettencourt-v-state-cal-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack