Bettenbrock v. Harper

112 N.E. 775, 185 Ind. 716, 1916 Ind. LEXIS 97
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 12, 1916
DocketNo. 22,902
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 112 N.E. 775 (Bettenbrock v. Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bettenbrock v. Harper, 112 N.E. 775, 185 Ind. 716, 1916 Ind. LEXIS 97 (Ind. 1916).

Opinion

Cox, J.

— Appellee Harper and 362 other qualified petitioners instituted a proceeding under §62 of the Highway Act of 1905 (Acts' 1905 p. 550, §7711 Bums 1908, as amended in 1913 (Acts 1913 p. 914, §7711a Burns 1914), for the pavement with concrete of an existing free gravel road less than three miles in length. Such proceedings were had below as to present in this appeal the same questions as were presented and decided in the case of Bettenbrock v. Miller (No. 22,901), ante 600, 112 N. E. 771, and on the authority of the decision in that case, the judgment in this is affirmed.

Morris, C. J. — Dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Public Utilities Co. v. Handorf
112 N.E. 775 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 N.E. 775, 185 Ind. 716, 1916 Ind. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bettenbrock-v-harper-ind-1916.