Bett v. City of Lackawanna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bett v. City of Lackawanna

41 A.D.3d 1249, 836 N.Y.S.2d 468

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.D.3d 1249 (Bett v. City of Lackawanna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bett v. City of Lackawanna, 41 A.D.3d 1249, 836 N.Y.S.2d 468 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John M. Curran, J.), entered August 21, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, granted the petition to the extent of invalidating the notice from respondent that petitioner’s General Municipal Law § 207-a benefits were terminated and to the extent of awarding petitioner costs and denied respondent’s cross motion to dismiss the petition.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. Present— Gorski, J.P., Martoche, Centra, Fahey and Peradotto, JJ. [See 12 Misc 3d 1178(A), 2006 NY Slip Op 51284(U).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John M. Curran, J.), entered August 21, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, granted the petition to the extent of invalidating the notice from respondent that petitioner’s General Municipal Law § 207-a benefits were terminated and to the extent of awarding petitioner costs and denied respondent’s cross motion to dismiss the petition.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. Present— Gorski, J.P., Martoche, Centra, Fahey and Peradotto, JJ. [See 12 Misc 3d 1178(A), 2006 NY Slip Op 51284(U).]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.3d 1249, 836 N.Y.S.2d 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bett-v-city-of-lackawanna-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack