Betko v. Stop and Shop Holdings, No. Cv 93 0520390 S (Jun. 2, 1995)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 6677
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided June 2, 1995·No. No. CV 93 0520390 S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The court cannot find that the condition of the floor had existed for such a length of time that defendant's employees, in the exercise of due care, should have discovered it in time to remedy the condition before plaintiff's fall. Monahan v. Montgomery, 153 Conn. 386, CT Page 6678 390-393; White v. E F Construction Co., 151 Conn. 110,113-114; compare Monis v. King Cole Stores, Inc., 132 Conn. 499,492-493; Sokolowski v. Medi Mart, Inc., 24 Conn. App. 276,285-287.

Plaintiff has not sustained her burden of proof in regard to defendant's negligence.

Judgment for defendant.

Norris L. O'Neill, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Betko v. Stop and Shop Holdings, No. Cv 93 0520390 S (Jun. 2, 1995), 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 6677 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 6677 (Betko v. Stop and Shop Holdings, No. Cv 93 0520390 S (Jun. 2, 1995)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Monahan v. Montgomery
216 A.2d 824 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1966)
White v. E & F CONSTRUCTION CO.
193 A.2d 716 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1963)
Sokolowski v. Medi Mart, Inc.
587 A.2d 1056 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1991)