Betko v. Stop and Shop Holdings, No. Cv 93 0520390 S (Jun. 2, 1995)

Connecticut Superior Court

Betko v. Stop and Shop Holdings, No. Cv 93 0520390 S (Jun. 2, 1995)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 6677

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedJune 2, 1995

DocketNo. CV 93 0520390 S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 6677 (Betko v. Stop and Shop Holdings, No. Cv 93 0520390 S (Jun. 2, 1995)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Betko v. Stop and Shop Holdings, No. Cv 93 0520390 S (Jun. 2, 1995), 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 6677 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The court cannot find that the condition of the floor had existed for such a length of time that defendant's employees, in the exercise of due care, should have discovered it in time to remedy the condition before plaintiff's fall. Monahan v. Montgomery, 153 Conn. 386, CT Page 6678 390-393; White v. E F Construction Co., 151 Conn. 110,113-114; compare Monis v. King Cole Stores, Inc., 132 Conn. 499,492-493; Sokolowski v. Medi Mart, Inc., 24 Conn. App. 276,285-287.

Plaintiff has not sustained her burden of proof in regard to defendant's negligence.

Judgment for defendant.

Norris L. O'Neill, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The court cannot find that the condition of the floor had existed for such a length of time that defendant's employees, in the exercise of due care, should have discovered it in time to remedy the condition before plaintiff's fall. Monahan v. Montgomery, 153 Conn. 386, CT Page 6678 390-393; White v. E F Construction Co., 151 Conn. 110,113-114; compare Monis v. King Cole Stores, Inc., 132 Conn. 499,492-493; Sokolowski v. Medi Mart, Inc., 24 Conn. App. 276,285-287.

Plaintiff has not sustained her burden of proof in regard to defendant's negligence.

Judgment for defendant.

Norris L. O'Neill, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 6677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betko-v-stop-and-shop-holdings-no-cv-93-0520390-s-jun-2-1995-connsuperct-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack