Bethune v. Bethune
This text of 387 N.E.2d 1220 (Bethune v. Bethune) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[899]*899OPINION OF THE COURT
Order reversed, with costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court, Nassau County, reinstated for the reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice James F. Niehoff at Trial Term.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg. Judge Jasen dissents and votes to affirm in the following memorandum: I would agree with the majority at the Appellate Division that the separation agreement construed as an entity, does not mandate an open-ended obligation to provide university tuition and "living expenses” to an emancipated adult child.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
387 N.E.2d 1220, 46 N.Y.2d 897, 414 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bethune-v-bethune-ny-1979.