Bethlehem Steel Co. v. International Combustion Engineering Corp.

Second Circuit

Bethlehem Steel Co. v. International Combustion Engineering Corp.

68 F.2d 952, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 5034

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJanuary 8, 1934

DocketNo. 122

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 68 F.2d 952 (Bethlehem Steel Co. v. International Combustion Engineering Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bethlehem Steel Co. v. International Combustion Engineering Corp., 68 F.2d 952, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 5034 (2d Cir. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Receivers were appointed for the appellee International Combustion Engineering Corporation. The appellant had granted to him patents on inventions which were held by the receivers and sought by this petition to intervene to protect his interest in such patents under contracts entered into between the petitioner and the corporation. The District Court, in the exercise of a sound discretion, denied the petition. The appeal is from the order entered thereon. A motion has been made to dismiss the appeal. The motion will be granted for the order is not appealable. See City of N. Y. v. Consolidated Gas Co., 253 U. S. 219, 40 S. Ct. 511, 64 L. Ed. 870; City of N. Y. v. N. Y. Tel. Co., 261 U. S. 312, 43 S. Ct. 372, 67 L. Ed. 673; Palmer v. Bankers’ Trust Co., 12 F.(2d) 747 (C. C. A. 8).

-Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Receivers were appointed for the appellee International Combustion Engineering Corporation. The appellant had granted to him patents on inventions which were held by the receivers and sought by this petition to intervene to protect his interest in such patents under contracts entered into between the petitioner and the corporation. The District Court, in the exercise of a sound discretion, denied the petition. The appeal is from the order entered thereon. A motion has been made to dismiss the appeal. The motion will be granted for the order is not appealable. See City of N. Y. v. Consolidated Gas Co., 253 U. S. 219, 40 S. Ct. 511, 64 L. Ed. 870; City of N. Y. v. N. Y. Tel. Co., 261 U. S. 312, 43 S. Ct. 372, 67 L. Ed. 673; Palmer v. Bankers’ Trust Co., 12 F.(2d) 747 (C. C. A. 8).

-Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 F.2d 952, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 5034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bethlehem-steel-co-v-international-combustion-engineering-corp-ca2-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack