Bethesda Healthcare System, Inc. v. Agency for Health Care Administration

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bethesda Healthcare System, Inc. v. Agency for Health Care Administration

829 So. 2d 353, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15860, 2002 WL 31431632

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 1, 2002

DocketNo. 1D01-4941

StatusPublished

This text of 829 So. 2d 353 (Bethesda Healthcare System, Inc. v. Agency for Health Care Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bethesda Healthcare System, Inc. v. Agency for Health Care Administration, 829 So. 2d 353, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15860, 2002 WL 31431632 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this administrative appeal, the sole issue properly before us is whether, as required by section 120.54(3)(d)l, Florida Statutes (2001), the Agency for Health Care Administration’s June 15, 2001, Notice of Change to proposed amendments to Florida Administrative Code Rule 59C-1.033 was “supported by the record of public hearings held on the rule [or was] in response to written material received on or before the date of the final public hearing.” Because we conclude that the administrative law judge’s finding that it was is supported by competent and substantial evidence, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

MINER, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this administrative appeal, the sole issue properly before us is whether, as required by section 120.54(3)(d)l, Florida Statutes (2001), the Agency for Health Care Administration’s June 15, 2001, Notice of Change to proposed amendments to Florida Administrative Code Rule 59C-1.033 was “supported by the record of public hearings held on the rule [or was] in response to written material received on or before the date of the final public hearing.” Because we conclude that the administrative law judge’s finding that it was is supported by competent and substantial evidence, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

MINER, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

829 So. 2d 353, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15860, 2002 WL 31431632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bethesda-healthcare-system-inc-v-agency-for-health-care-administration-fladistctapp-2002.