Bethel v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bethel v. New York City Transit Authority

242 A.D.2d 223, 661 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8288

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bethel v. New York City Transit Authority. Read the opinion of the Court — 215 A.D.2d 206 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 14, 1997·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J., and a jury), entered October 7, 1996, in a personal injury action, awarding plaintiff $252,577.19, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff offered sufficient evidence at trial on the issue of whether defendant had constructive notice of a defect for the jury to decide the matter, and the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence.

We have considered defendant’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J., and a jury), entered October 7, 1996, in a personal injury action, awarding plaintiff $252,577.19, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff offered sufficient evidence at trial on the issue of whether defendant had constructive notice of a defect for the jury to decide the matter, and the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence.

We have considered defendant’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Bethel v. New York City Transit Authority, 242 A.D.2d 223, 661 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8288 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

242 A.D.2d 223 (Bethel v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.