Bethel v. Lynaugh
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-40535 Summary Calendar __________________
ANTHONY LINDON BETHEL,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JAMES A. LYNAUGH et. al.,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:94-CV-224 - - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its
own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th
Cir. 1987). Anthony Lindon Bethel has filed a notice of appeal
from an order of the district court that did not adjudicate all
of the claims against all of the parties. This court is without
jurisdiction to hear this appeal. See Borne v. A & P Boat
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-40535 -2-
Rentals No. 4, Inc., 755 F.2d 1131, 1133 (5th Cir. 1985). The
appeal is DISMISSED.
In addition, we note that Bethel has been warned that
sanctions would be brought against him if he filed frivolous
appeals. In spite of this, Bethel has continued to file
frivolous appeals. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Bethel is
barred from filing any pro se civil appeal in this court, or any
initial civil pleading in any court which is subject to this
court's jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a
judge of the forum court. The clerk of this court and the Clerk
of all federal courts in this circuit are directed to return to
Bethel, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this
bar.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION IMPOSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bethel v. Lynaugh (Bethel v. Lynaugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.