Bethea v. Webb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bethea v. Webb

92 A.D.2d 611, 460 N.Y.S.2d 279, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16877

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 92 A.D.2d 611 (Bethea v. Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bethea v. Webb, 92 A.D.2d 611, 460 N.Y.S.2d 279, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the State Commissioner of Social Services, dated October 28, 1980 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the local agency to deny petitioner home relief because her income exceeded her budgetary needs. Petition granted, determination annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and respondents are directed to grant petitioner a basic needs allowance for a household of one, retroactive to June 11,1980. The agency failed to justify its application of 18 NYCRR 352.32 to petitioner (see Matter of Grady v D’Elia, 87 AD2d 592). Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Thompson and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the State Commissioner of Social Services, dated October 28, 1980 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the local agency to deny petitioner home relief because her income exceeded her budgetary needs. Petition granted, determination annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and respondents are directed to grant petitioner a basic needs allowance for a household of one, retroactive to June 11,1980. The agency failed to justify its application of 18 NYCRR 352.32 to petitioner (see Matter of Grady v D’Elia, 87 AD2d 592). Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Thompson and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 A.D.2d 611, 460 N.Y.S.2d 279, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bethea-v-webb-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack