Bethea v. Blanchard & Johnson Transportation

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1073

DAVID BETHEA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BLANCHARD & JOHNSON TRANSPORTATION,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:07-cv-02257-RBH)

Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 27, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Bethea, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Bethea appeals the district court’s orders

accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Bethea v. Blanchard &

Johnson Transp., No. 4:07-cv-02257-RBH (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 2008;

Dec. 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED