Bethea, D. v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Bethea, D. v. Commonwealth

163 A.3d 397, 2016 WL 7010510, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2717

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 30, 2016·No. 150 EM 2016·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Prohibition and/or Alternative Mandamus, the Application for Waiver and Modification of Rules, and the “Motion to Remove Constitutional [sic] Deficient Assistance of Counsel From Obstruction and Impeding Disclosure of Discovery on PCRA Collateral Review Appeal Permanently” are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Prohibition and/or Alternative Mandamus, the Application for Waiver and Modification of Rules, and the “Motion to Remove Constitutional [sic] Deficient Assistance of Counsel From Obstruction and Impeding Disclosure of Discovery on PCRA Collateral Review Appeal Permanently” are DENIED.

Bethea, D. v. Commonwealth, 163 A.3d 397, 2016 WL 7010510, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2717 (Pa. 2016).

Pincite

163 A.3d 397 (Bethea, D. v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.