Bethany Farber v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California·Decided August 19, 2022·No. 2:22-cv-01173·Unknown

Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-01173-ODW-KS Document 29 Filed 08/19/22 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:169 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 BETHANY FARBER, an individual, CASE NO. CV22-01173-ODW-KS Hon. Otis D. Wright II, Ctrm. 5D, 5th Fl. 12 Mag. Karen L. Stevenson, Ctrm. 580, 5th Fl. Plaintiff, 13 ____________ v. [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 15 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 16 17 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 22 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or 23 private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for 24 any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the 25 parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated 26 Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket 27 protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords 28 from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are 1 Case 2:22-cv-01173-ODW-KS Document 29 Filed 08/19/22 Page 2 of 14 Page ID #:170 1 entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further 2 acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does 3 not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth 4 the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party 5 seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 6 8 This action is likely to involve confidential information. Plaintiff’s are seeking 9 information that Defendant City of Los Angeles maintains as confidential, such as 10 personnel files of the police officers involved in this incident, internal affairs materials 11 and information, and other administrative material currently in the possession of the City. 12 Plaintiff’s are also seeking official information contained in the personnel files of the 13 involved police officers, which the City maintains as strictly confidential. The City 14 believes these documents need special protection from public disclosure and from use 15 for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation. These materials have not been 16 publically released. 17 The City asserts that the confidentiality of the materials and information sought 18 by Plaintiff is recognized by California and federal law, as evidenced by Cal. Pen. Code 19 Sec. 832.7 and Kerr v. United States Dist. Ct. for N.D. Cal., 511 F.2d 192, 198 (9th Cir. 20 1975), aff’d 426 U.S. 394 (1976). Unfettered disclosure of the confidential information 21 contained in these files, absent a protective order, would allow the media to share this 22 information with potential jurors in the area, impacting the rights of the City to receive a 23 fair trial. 24 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt 25 resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect 26 information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are 27 permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct 28 of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice,

2 Case 2:22-cv-01173-ODW-KS Document 29 Filed 08/19/22 Page 3 of 14 Page ID #:171 1 a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the 2 parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that 3 nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a 4 confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the 5 public record of this case. 6 7 2. DEFINITIONS 8 2.1 Action: this pending federal law suit. 9 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 10 information or items under this Order. 11 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how 12 it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under 13 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause 14 Statement. 15 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their 16 support staff). 17 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 18 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 19 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of 20 the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among 21 other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated 22 in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 23 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 24 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an 25 expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 26 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. House 27 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 28

3 Case 2:22-cv-01173-ODW-KS Document 29 Filed 08/19/22 Page 4 of 14 Page ID #:172 1 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 2 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 3 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to 4 this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have appeared 5 in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared 6 on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 7 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 8 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 9 support staffs). 10 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 11 Discovery Material in this Action. 12 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 13 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 14 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and 15 their employees and subcontractors. 16 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 17 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 18 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 19 from a Producing Party. 20 3. SCOPE 21 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 22 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted 23 from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected 24 Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their 25 Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 26 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the trial 27 judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 28 \\

4 Case 2:22-cv-01173-ODW-KS Document 29 Filed 08/19/22 Page 5 of 14 Page ID #:173 1 4. DURATION 2 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations 3 imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise 4 in writing or a court order otherwise directs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bethany Farber v. City of Los Angeles, (C.D. Cal. 2022).

Bethany Farber v. City of Los Angeles (Bethany Farber v. City of Los Angeles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related