Betenbaugh, Auditor v. S.C. Tax Comm.

132 S.E. 589, 134 S.C. 281, 1926 S.C. LEXIS 36
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedApril 5, 1926
Docket11948
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 132 S.E. 589 (Betenbaugh, Auditor v. S.C. Tax Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Betenbaugh, Auditor v. S.C. Tax Comm., 132 S.E. 589, 134 S.C. 281, 1926 S.C. LEXIS 36 (S.C. 1926).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Acting Associate Justice R. O. Purdy.

The nature of the controversy and a full statement of the facts are set forth in the decree of his Honor, Judge Bonham. The reasoning of his Honor and the conclusions reached by him are satisfactory to this Court in the disposition of the matter at issue. The exceptions to- his decree are, therefore, overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Let the decree of his Honor, Judge Bonham, be reported.

Messrs. Justices Watts, Cothran, BlEase and Stabler concur. Mr. Chief Justice Gary did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murph, County Auditor v. Query
40 S.E.2d 245 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 S.E. 589, 134 S.C. 281, 1926 S.C. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betenbaugh-auditor-v-sc-tax-comm-sc-1926.