Betenbaugh, Auditor v. S.C. Tax Comm.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Betenbaugh, Auditor v. S.C. Tax Comm.

132 S.E. 589, 134 S.C. 281, 1926 S.C. LEXIS 36

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 5, 1926·No. 11948·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Acting Associate Justice R. O. Purdy.

The nature of the controversy and a full statement of the facts are set forth in the decree of his Honor, Judge Bonham. The reasoning of his Honor and the conclusions reached by him are satisfactory to this Court in the disposition of the matter at issue. The exceptions to- his decree are, therefore, overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Let the decree of his Honor, Judge Bonham, be reported.

Messrs. Justices Watts, Cothran, BlEase and Stabler concur. Mr. Chief Justice Gary did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Acting Associate Justice R. O. Purdy.

The nature of the controversy and a full statement of the facts are set forth in the decree of his Honor, Judge Bonham. The reasoning of his Honor and the conclusions reached by him are satisfactory to this Court in the disposition of the matter at issue. The exceptions to- his decree are, therefore, overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Let the decree of his Honor, Judge Bonham, be reported.

Messrs. Justices Watts, Cothran, BlEase and Stabler concur. Mr. Chief Justice Gary did not participate.

Betenbaugh, Auditor v. S.C. Tax Comm., 132 S.E. 589, 134 S.C. 281, 1926 S.C. LEXIS 36 (S.C. 1926).

Pincite

132 S.E. 589 (Betenbaugh, Auditor v. S.C. Tax Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related