Betancourt v. Wilson

New York Court of Appeals

Betancourt v. Wilson

149 N.E.2d 893, 4 N.Y.2d 808

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 27, 1958

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 149 N.E.2d 893 (Betancourt v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Betancourt v. Wilson, 149 N.E.2d 893, 4 N.Y.2d 808 (N.Y. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed and a new trial granted as to each plaintiff, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that this record presented questions of fact for a jury as to negligence and contributory negligence. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel. Judges Van Voobhis and Burke dissent and vote to affirm upon the Per Curiam opinion in the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed and a new trial granted as to each plaintiff, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that this record presented questions of fact for a jury as to negligence and contributory negligence. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel. Judges Van Voobhis and Burke dissent and vote to affirm upon the Per Curiam opinion in the Appellate Division.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 N.E.2d 893, 4 N.Y.2d 808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betancourt-v-wilson-ny-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack