Betancourt v. State
840 So. 2d 410, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3705, 2003 WL 1240468
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 19, 2003
DocketNo. 3D02-2497
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 840 So. 2d 410 (Betancourt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Betancourt v. State, 840 So. 2d 410, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3705, 2003 WL 1240468 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
Opinion
Affirmed. Diaz v. State, 534 So.2d 817 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)(“To prevail and set aside a nolo or guilty plea alleging ineffectiveness of original trial counsel, a defendant must show that he, in fact, had a ‘viable’ defense.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Carnoto
840 So. 2d 410 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
840 So. 2d 410, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3705, 2003 WL 1240468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betancourt-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.