Betancourt v. Crosby
917 So. 2d 307, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20025, 2005 WL 3479833
Opinion
Upon consideration of the appellant’s “Motion to Stay Appeal Proceedings,” which the Court treats as a response to its order of October 14, 2005, the Court has determined that the “Order Denying Relief from Order” is not an appealable order. See Bennett’s Leasing, Inc. v. First Street Mortgage Corp., 870 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); see also Banks v. State, 916 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Betancourt v. Crosby, 917 So. 2d 307, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20025, 2005 WL 3479833 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
917 So. 2d 307 (Betancourt v. Crosby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Banks v. State
916 So. 2d 35 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Bennett's Leasing, Inc. v. First Street Mortgage Corp.
870 So. 2d 93 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)