Betances v. 185-189 Audubon Realty, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Betances v. 185-189 Audubon Realty, LLC

139 A.D.3d 404, 29 N.Y.S.3d 162

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 2016

Docket1007 305916/12

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 139 A.D.3d 404 (Betances v. 185-189 Audubon Realty, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Betances v. 185-189 Audubon Realty, LLC, 139 A.D.3d 404, 29 N.Y.S.3d 162 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered on or about December 1, 2014, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly granted in this action where plaintiff alleges that she was injured when, while descending the staircase in defendant’s building, she slipped and fell on a plastic bag that was on the staircase. There is no *405 testimony that defendant created the condition by depositing the plastic bag on the stairwell. On the issue of actual or constructive notice, where the hazardous condition is transitory, a defendant may establish its entitlement to summary judgment by demonstrating that the condition could have arisen shortly before the accident (see Rivera v 2160 Realty Co., L.L.C., 4 NY3d 837 [2005]; Brooks-Torrence v Twin Parks Southwest, 133 AD3d 536 [1st Dept 2015]). Here, plaintiff testified that she did not see the plastic bag or any other debris on the staircase when she arrived at defendant’s building, only seeing the bag after she fell.

Furthermore, to the extent plaintiff argues that dim lighting in the staircase caused or contributed to her accident, the motion court correctly concluded that plaintiff did not, in her testimony, expressly link her accident to the alleged lack of lighting in the stairs.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Renwick, Richter, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered on or about December 1, 2014, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly granted in this action where plaintiff alleges that she was injured when, while descending the staircase in defendant’s building, she slipped and fell on a plastic bag that was on the staircase. There is no *405 testimony that defendant created the condition by depositing the plastic bag on the stairwell. On the issue of actual or constructive notice, where the hazardous condition is transitory, a defendant may establish its entitlement to summary judgment by demonstrating that the condition could have arisen shortly before the accident (see Rivera v 2160 Realty Co., L.L.C., 4 NY3d 837 [2005]; Brooks-Torrence v Twin Parks Southwest, 133 AD3d 536 [1st Dept 2015]). Here, plaintiff testified that she did not see the plastic bag or any other debris on the staircase when she arrived at defendant’s building, only seeing the bag after she fell.

Furthermore, to the extent plaintiff argues that dim lighting in the staircase caused or contributed to her accident, the motion court correctly concluded that plaintiff did not, in her testimony, expressly link her accident to the alleged lack of lighting in the stairs.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Renwick, Richter, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 A.D.3d 404, 29 N.Y.S.3d 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betances-v-185-189-audubon-realty-llc-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack