Bestwick v. Ormsby Coal Co.

18 A. 538, 129 Pa. 592, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 991
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 28, 1889
DocketNo. 16
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 18 A. 538 (Bestwick v. Ormsby Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bestwick v. Ormsby Coal Co., 18 A. 538, 129 Pa. 592, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 991 (Pa. 1889).

Opinion

Opinion,

Mb. Justice Stebbett :

By agreement of counsel, this cause was tried by the court below without the intervention of a jury. All the facts necessary to a proper understanding of the questions that arose appear in the record that was made up by the learned judge who presided at the trial. The cause was well tried. The questions ' now presented by the specifications of error appear to have been fully considered and correctly disposed of. We find nothing in the record that calls for a reversal of the judgment. For the reasons given in the decision of the learned judge, and in his opinion overruling exceptions thereto, the judgment should be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dougherty, Tr. v. Thomas, Exr.
169 A. 219 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Fisher v. Maple Block Coal Co.
184 Iowa 397 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1918)
Wife v. Tripple State Nat. Gas & Oil Co.
115 S.W. 819 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 A. 538, 129 Pa. 592, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bestwick-v-ormsby-coal-co-pa-1889.