Bestwick v. Ormsby Coal Co.

18 A. 538, 129 Pa. 592, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 991
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 28, 1889·No. No. 16·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion,

Mb. Justice Stebbett :

By agreement of counsel, this cause was tried by the court below without the intervention of a jury. All the facts necessary to a proper understanding of the questions that arose appear in the record that was made up by the learned judge who presided at the trial. The cause was well tried. The questions ' now presented by the specifications of error appear to have been fully considered and correctly disposed of. We find nothing in the record that calls for a reversal of the judgment. For the reasons given in the decision of the learned judge, and in his opinion overruling exceptions thereto, the judgment should be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bestwick v. Ormsby Coal Co., 18 A. 538, 129 Pa. 592, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 991 (Pa. 1889).

18 A. 538 (Bestwick v. Ormsby Coal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dougherty, Tr. v. Thomas, Exr.
169 A. 219 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Fisher v. Maple Block Coal Co.
184 Iowa 397 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1918)
Wife v. Tripple State Nat. Gas & Oil Co.
115 S.W. 819 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1909)