Bestin Realty, S.A. v. SCI Claridge

128 A.D.3d 503, 7 N.Y.S.3d 896
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 14, 2015·No. 15125 602705/08·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered October 23, 2013, which denied defendant’s motion to vacate a default judgment entered against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to vacate the default judgment pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (3), because defendant failed to show that plaintiff committed fraud in procuring the judgment. Rather, defendant attempted to show that there was fraud in the underlying transaction (see Nichols v Curtis, 104 AD3d 526, 529 [1st Dept 2013]; Jericho Group, Ltd. v Midtown Dev., L.P., 47 AD3d 463 [1st Dept 2008], lv dismissed 11 NY3d 801 [2008]). Concur — Friedman, J.P., Saxe, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bestin Realty, S.A. v. SCI Claridge, 128 A.D.3d 503, 7 N.Y.S.3d 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

128 A.D.3d 503 (Bestin Realty, S.A. v. SCI Claridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jericho Group, Ltd. v. Midtown Development, L.P.
47 A.D.3d 463 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Nichols v. Curtis
104 A.D.3d 526 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)