Best v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, Office of Child Support Services ex rel. Donaldson

528 So. 2d 532, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1749, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3326, 1988 WL 74809
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 20, 1988
DocketNo. 87-2840
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 528 So. 2d 532 (Best v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, Office of Child Support Services ex rel. Donaldson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Best v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, Office of Child Support Services ex rel. Donaldson, 528 So. 2d 532, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1749, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3326, 1988 WL 74809 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

THREADGILL, Judge.

Appellant, Johnnie Best, appeals the denial of his petition to reduce child support payments by the amount of social security benefits being received by the child. We affirm.

Appellant is required to make child support payments pursuant to a final judgment of paternity entered in August, 1985. Subsequent to the entry of this judgment, the appellant petitioned the Social Security Administration for financial benefits for the child based on his total permanent disability. The Administration began paying the child’s mother periodic disability benefits in November, 1986. The mother also received a retroactive lump sum payment on the child’s behalf.

We agree that the mother’s receipt of the benefits does not give rise to an automatic reduction of the support payment. See § 61.14, Fla.Stat. (1987); Lee v. Lee, 157 Fla. 439, 26 So.2d 177 (Fla.1956). Therefore, we affirm the order denying the petition without prejudice to appellant to seek modification based on a change of his financial circumstances or a change in the child’s needs subsequent to entry of the final judgment.

Appellant’s remaining point on appeal is without merit.

Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and SCHEB, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Williams
560 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
528 So. 2d 532, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1749, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3326, 1988 WL 74809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/best-v-state-department-of-health-rehabilitative-services-office-of-fladistctapp-1988.