Best v. Radna

288 A.D.2d 248, 732 N.Y.S.2d 589, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10940

This text of 288 A.D.2d 248 (Best v. Radna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Best v. Radna, 288 A.D.2d 248, 732 N.Y.S.2d 589, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10940 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated October 20, 2000, which denied her motion to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.

In light of this Court’s opinion and order in Basetti v Nour (287 AD2d 126), the plaintiff’s timely motion to restore the action to the trial calendar should have been granted. Bracken, P. J., Krausman, Luciano, Smith and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Basetti v. Nour
287 A.D.2d 126 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
288 A.D.2d 248, 732 N.Y.S.2d 589, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/best-v-radna-nyappdiv-2001.