Best v. Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Best v. Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center

271 A.D.2d 467, 706 N.Y.S.2d 903, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4042

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 10, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 467 (Best v. Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Best v. Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center, 271 A.D.2d 467, 706 N.Y.S.2d 903, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4042 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for the negligent infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated June 8, 1999, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The plaintiff’s conclusions and unsubstantiated allegations submitted in opposition thereto were insufficient to defeat the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). O’Brien, J. P., Altman, Friedmann, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for the negligent infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated June 8, 1999, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The plaintiff’s conclusions and unsubstantiated allegations submitted in opposition thereto were insufficient to defeat the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). O’Brien, J. P., Altman, Friedmann, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 467, 706 N.Y.S.2d 903, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/best-v-long-island-jewish-hillside-medical-center-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack