Best v. Leonardo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Best v. Leonardo

194 A.D.2d 1018, 600 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6562

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 194 A.D.2d 1018 (Best v. Leonardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Best v. Leonardo, 194 A.D.2d 1018, 600 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6562 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner challenges the determination that he violated certain prison disciplinary rules. He also contends that a mandatory $5 disciplinary surcharge imposed upon him after he was found guilty is illegal. The Attorney-General has [1019]*1019submitted administrative memoranda indicating that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and expunged from petitioner’s record, and that the $5 surcharge has been returned to petitioner’s account. This proceeding is therefore moot (see, Matter of Wong v Coughlin, 150 AD2d 832).

Weiss, P. J., Yesawich Jr., Levine, Mercure and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner challenges the determination that he violated certain prison disciplinary rules. He also contends that a mandatory $5 disciplinary surcharge imposed upon him after he was found guilty is illegal. The Attorney-General has [1019]*1019submitted administrative memoranda indicating that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and expunged from petitioner’s record, and that the $5 surcharge has been returned to petitioner’s account. This proceeding is therefore moot (see, Matter of Wong v Coughlin, 150 AD2d 832).

Weiss, P. J., Yesawich Jr., Levine, Mercure and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 A.D.2d 1018, 600 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/best-v-leonardo-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack