Best v. Guptill
This text of 65 N.E.2d 422 (Best v. Guptill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Orders denying jury issues affirmed. These are appeals from orders of the Probate Court denying motions for jury issues in the matter of the alleged will of Lizzie J. Burgess, late of Quincy, deceased. There was no error. We are unable to say upon the statements of expected evidence, making due allowance to the conclusion of the probate judge, that there were “a genuine and doubtful question of fact” and “a reasonable hope for a result favorable to the party requesting the framing of issues.” Fuller v. Sylvia, 240 Mass. 49, 53. Slater v. Munroe, 316 Mass. 129, 131-132.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
65 N.E.2d 422, 319 Mass. 723, 1946 Mass. LEXIS 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/best-v-guptill-mass-1946.