Best v. Davis

18 Wis. 386
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1864
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 18 Wis. 386 (Best v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Best v. Davis, 18 Wis. 386 (Wis. 1864).

Opinion

By the Court,

Dixon, C. J.

Tbe objection to tbe form of tbe register’s certificate is too vague and uncertain to be available in this court. It is, in general terms, to tbe introduction of tbe notice of pendency of action, without specifying any ground upon which it is made. It should be specific, and clearly point out tbe defect complained of, in order that tbe opposite party may, if be can, remedy it upon tbe trial below. In most cases, the opposite party bas it in his power to- obviate such defects at tbe trial. They are usually tbe result of clerical mistakes or oversights, and it would be most unjust to allow them to come here upon general objections which give neither the party nor the court any information at all. Such a practice cannot be sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seton v. Hoyt
43 L.R.A. 634 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1899)
Kollock v. Parcher
9 N.W. 67 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1881)
State ex rel. Swenson v. Norton
46 Wis. 332 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1879)
Evans v. Sprague
30 Wis. 303 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Wis. 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/best-v-davis-wis-1864.