Best v. City of Chehalis

144 P. 918, 82 Wash. 601, 1914 Wash. LEXIS 1566
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1914
DocketNo. 12147
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 144 P. 918 (Best v. City of Chehalis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Best v. City of Chehalis, 144 P. 918, 82 Wash. 601, 1914 Wash. LEXIS 1566 (Wash. 1914).

Opinion

Gose, J.

This is an action for damages for the removal of lateral support flowing from an original grade of a street. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs. The defendant has appealed.

■ Counsel for the respondents state their case in their brief as follows:

“This is an action for damages occasioned respondents by appellant in removing the lateral support of respondents’ property in Chehalis, Washington. It was charged in the complaint, admitted in the answer, and proved by witnesses that the earth was entirely removed to respondents’ property line. As a result of this, such embankments caved off and slipped into the street. The soil was of a slippery, soap-stone variety. City officials, testifying for appellants, admitted that they knew the embankments would fall but made no effort to prevent same.”

[602]*602At the close of the evidence, the appellant moved for a directed verdict in its favor, for the following reasons: First, because it is shown by the pleadings and the evidence that the grade was an original one, that the cut was wholly within the street, and that the grading was done by the city in pursuance of proceedings regularly and lawfully taken; second, because there was no evidence that the city was guilty of negligence in the prosecution of the work; third, because the only complaint of the respondents is that the city failed to provide a retaining wall in its plans for the improvement of the street.

The motion should have been granted. Schuss v. Chehalis, ante p. 595, 144 Pac. 916.

Reversed.

Crow, C. J., Morris, Parker, and Chadwick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lochore v. City of Seattle
167 P. 918 (Washington Supreme Court, 1917)
Mintzer v. City of Richmond
150 P. 799 (California Court of Appeal, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 P. 918, 82 Wash. 601, 1914 Wash. LEXIS 1566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/best-v-city-of-chehalis-wash-1914.