Best v. Cequel

Fourth Circuit

Best v. Cequel

598 F. App'x 178

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 19, 2015·No. No. 14-2379·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Dean Best appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Best v. Cequel, No. 4:14-cv-00061-FL, 2014 WL 6453960 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Dean Best appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Best v. Cequel, No. 4:14-cv-00061-FL, 2014 WL 6453960 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Best v. Cequel, 598 F. App'x 178 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

598 F. App'x 178 (Best v. Cequel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related