Best v. Cequel

598 F. App'x 178
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 19, 2015
DocketNo. 14-2379
StatusPublished

This text of 598 F. App'x 178 (Best v. Cequel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Best v. Cequel, 598 F. App'x 178 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Dean Best appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Best v. Cequel, No. 4:14-cv-00061-FL, 2014 WL 6453960 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
598 F. App'x 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/best-v-cequel-ca4-2015.