Best v. California

314 U.S. 609, 62 S. Ct. 117
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 13, 1941·No. No. 344; No. 586·Published

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, 2d Appellate District, of California; and

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

The motions for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis are denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds that the applications for writs of certiorari were not filed within the time provided by law. § 8 (a), Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 940); Finn v. Railroad Commission, 286 U. S. 559. The petitions for writs of certiorari are therefore also denied.

Reported below: No. 344, 43 Cal. App. 2d 100,110 P. 2d 504; No. 586, 138 Tex. Cr. R. 205,135 S. W. 2d 476; 150 S. W. 2d 395.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Best v. California, 314 U.S. 609, 62 S. Ct. 117 (1941).

314 U.S. 609 (Best v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Best
110 P.2d 504 (California Court of Appeal, 1941)
Hamilton v. State
135 S.W.2d 476 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1940)
Hamilton v. State
150 S.W.2d 395 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1941)
Finn v. Railroad Commission
286 U.S. 559 (Supreme Court, 1932)