Best Court Reporting Service, Inc. v. MGM Court Reporting Service, Inc.
This text of 248 A.D.2d 499 (Best Court Reporting Service, Inc. v. MGM Court Reporting Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Franco, J.), dated March 25, 1997, which denied their motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the first and second causes of action asserted in the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs first and second causes of action to recover damages for fraud and breach of fiduciary duty was properly denied. The evidence proffered by the plaintiff in opposition to the motion was sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether there was conduct leading to separate tort liability arising from a breach of duty distinct from, or in addition to, any claim alleging breach of contract (see, Meyers v Waverly Fabrics, 65 NY2d 75; see also, North Shore Bottling Co. v Schmidt & Sons, 22 NY2d 171, 179).
The defendants’ remaining contention was not raised in the Supreme Court and is, therefore, not properly before this Court on appeal (see, Robinson v Donald C. Swanson, Inc., 205 AD2d 678).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D.2d 499, 669 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/best-court-reporting-service-inc-v-mgm-court-reporting-service-inc-nyappdiv-1998.