Best Buy Hosiery of Georgia, Inc. v. William Miller Associates, Inc.

215 S.E.2d 25, 134 Ga. App. 472, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2042
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 7, 1975·No. 50241·Published

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

In order to determine whether there is merit in any of the enumeration of errors, a consideration of the evidence is necessary. The record does not contain a transcript. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed. Lankford v. Lankford, 225 Ga. 147 (166 SE2d 354); Wright v. Cooper, 123 Ga. App. 204 (180 SE2d 261).

Judgment affirmed.

Webb and Marshall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Best Buy Hosiery of Georgia, Inc. v. William Miller Associates, Inc., 215 S.E.2d 25, 134 Ga. App. 472, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2042 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).

215 S.E.2d 25 (Best Buy Hosiery of Georgia, Inc. v. William Miller Associates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lankford v. Lankford
166 S.E.2d 354 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1969)
Wright v. Cooper
180 S.E.2d 261 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)