Best Buy Hosiery of Georgia, Inc. v. William Miller Associates, Inc.

215 S.E.2d 25, 134 Ga. App. 472, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2042
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 7, 1975
Docket50241
StatusPublished

This text of 215 S.E.2d 25 (Best Buy Hosiery of Georgia, Inc. v. William Miller Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Best Buy Hosiery of Georgia, Inc. v. William Miller Associates, Inc., 215 S.E.2d 25, 134 Ga. App. 472, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2042 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

In order to determine whether there is merit in any of the enumeration of errors, a consideration of the evidence is necessary. The record does not contain a transcript. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed. Lankford v. Lankford, 225 Ga. 147 (166 SE2d 354); Wright v. Cooper, 123 Ga. App. 204 (180 SE2d 261).

Judgment affirmed.

Webb and Marshall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lankford v. Lankford
166 S.E.2d 354 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1969)
Wright v. Cooper
180 S.E.2d 261 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 S.E.2d 25, 134 Ga. App. 472, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/best-buy-hosiery-of-georgia-inc-v-william-miller-associates-inc-gactapp-1975.