Bessinger v. OUR LADY OF GOOD COUNSEL

708 N.W.2d 433, 474 Mich. 1053, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 200
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bessinger v. OUR LADY OF GOOD COUNSEL. Read the opinion of the Court — 482 Mich. 996
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 31, 2006·No. 128870·Published

Opinion

708 N.W.2d 433 (2006)
474 Mich. 1053

Kenneth R. BESSINGER, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
OUR LADY OF GOOD COUNSEL, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 128870, COA No. 259974.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 31, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 29, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of *434 granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Worker's Compensation Appellate Commission. On remand, the WCAC shall clarify its position on the following issue: Notwithstanding that plaintiff's telemarketing job did not pay the maximum wages, was the telemarketing job within his qualifications and training at the time plaintiff suffered his back injury?

We retain jurisdiction.

MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would deny leave to appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bessinger v. OUR LADY OF GOOD COUNSEL, 708 N.W.2d 433, 474 Mich. 1053, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 200 (Mich. 2006).

708 N.W.2d 433 (Bessinger v. OUR LADY OF GOOD COUNSEL) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.