Home/Michigan Supreme Court/Bessinger v. OUR LADY OF GOOD COUNSEL

Bessinger v. OUR LADY OF GOOD COUNSEL

708 N.W.2d 433, 474 Mich. 1053, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 200
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 31, 2006
Docket128870
StatusPublished

This text of 708 N.W.2d 433 (Bessinger v. OUR LADY OF GOOD COUNSEL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bessinger v. OUR LADY OF GOOD COUNSEL, 708 N.W.2d 433, 474 Mich. 1053, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 200 (Mich. 2006).

Opinion

708 N.W.2d 433 (2006)
474 Mich. 1053

Kenneth R. BESSINGER, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
OUR LADY OF GOOD COUNSEL, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 128870, COA No. 259974.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 31, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 29, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of *434 granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Worker's Compensation Appellate Commission. On remand, the WCAC shall clarify its position on the following issue: Notwithstanding that plaintiff's telemarketing job did not pay the maximum wages, was the telemarketing job within his qualifications and training at the time plaintiff suffered his back injury?

We retain jurisdiction.

MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would deny leave to appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
708 N.W.2d 433, 474 Mich. 1053, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bessinger-v-our-lady-of-good-counsel-mich-2006.