Bessie Lou Wade, on Behalf of Morrison T. Wade v. William H. Bannan, Warden of the State Prison of Southern Michigan

249 F.2d 955
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 14, 1957
Docket13215
StatusPublished

This text of 249 F.2d 955 (Bessie Lou Wade, on Behalf of Morrison T. Wade v. William H. Bannan, Warden of the State Prison of Southern Michigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bessie Lou Wade, on Behalf of Morrison T. Wade v. William H. Bannan, Warden of the State Prison of Southern Michigan, 249 F.2d 955 (6th Cir. 1957).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In 1951 Morrison T. Wade was convicted after a jury trial in the Recorder's Court of the City of Detroit, Michigan, of conspiracy and criminal fraud, and under sentence of that court he is now confined in the state prison at Jackson, Michigan. Application for leave to appeal from his conviction was denied without opinion by the Supreme Court of Michigan. An appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States was dismissed, Wade v. State of Michigan, 350 U.S. 802, 76 S.Ct. 44, 100 L.Ed. 722, and a petition for rehearing in the nature of a writ of certiorari was denied, 350 U.S. 905, 76 S.Ct. 175, 100 L.Ed. 794. A petition for a writ of habeas corpus was then filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, and it is from an order dismissing the writ that this appeal has been taken.

The district court held a hearing at which the petitioner’s contentions were fully explored, and the court’s dismissal of the writ was based upon a very extensive opinion setting out the courts findings and conclusions with respect to each ground upon which the petitioner relied.

Examination of the record leaves us convinced that the court’s findings were supported by substantial evidence, and that the court was not in error in concluding that the irregularities of which the petitioner complains did not constitute a denial of Federal organic law. That being so the court’s order was correct, and it is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wade v. Michigan
350 U.S. 802 (Supreme Court, 1955)
Mississippi v. Louisiana
350 U.S. 905 (Supreme Court, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 F.2d 955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bessie-lou-wade-on-behalf-of-morrison-t-wade-v-william-h-bannan-warden-ca6-1957.