Bessie L. Webster v. VA Employment Comm.

• Court: Court of Appeals of Virginia
• Decided: April 2, 1996
• Docket: 1323954
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Benton, Willis and Overton Argued at Alexandria, Virginia

BESSIE L. WEBSTER MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 1323-95-4 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON APRIL 2, 1996 VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION AND STAFFORD COUNTY SCHOOLS

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF STAFFORD COUNTY James W. Haley, Jr., Judge Robin J. Mayer (Rappahannock Legal Services, Inc., on brief), for appellant.

Lisa J. Rowley, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General; D. Patrick Lacy, Jr.; Curtis G. Manchester; Hazel & Thomas, on brief), for appellees.

The Virginia Employment Commission (VEC) denied Bessie L.

Webster's request for unemployment benefits. Webster appeals the

judgment of the circuit court affirming the commission's finding

that Webster voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Finding no error in the judgment from which she appeals, we

affirm.

"When determining whether good cause existed for a claimant

to voluntarily leave employment, the [VEC] and the reviewing

courts must first apply an objective standard to the

reasonableness of the employment dispute and then to the

reasonableness of the employee's efforts to resolve that dispute

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. before leaving the employment." Umbarger v. Virginia Employment

Comm'n, 12 Va. App. 431, 435, 404 S.E.2d 380, 383 (1991).

However, the courts are governed by the statutory directive that

"the findings of the [VEC] as to the facts, if supported by

evidence and in the absence of fraud, shall be conclusive, and

the jurisdiction of the court shall be confined to questions of

law." Code § 60.2-625(A); see Shifflett v. Virginia Employment

Comm'n, 14 Va. App. 96, 97, 414 S.E.2d 865, 865 (1992). "The

VEC's findings may be rejected only if, in considering the record

as a whole, a reasonable mind would necessarily come to a

different conclusion." Craft v. Virginia Employment Comm'n, 8

Va. App. 607, 609, 383 S.E.2d 271, 273 (1989).

The record supports the VEC's determination that Webster did

not qualify for unemployment benefits because she did not have

good cause to leave her employment. Code § 60.2-618(1). Webster

worked as a custodian at a Stafford County School. During the

course of her employment, she had experienced various medical

problems, including pain in her heel, knee, and elbow. In March

1992 Webster saw her doctor because of continuing pain. Her

doctor diagnosed a bone spur on her heel and tendinitis in her

elbow, but he indicated that she could return to work the next

day, and he did not advise her to quit. Nevertheless, Webster

went to her principal and informed him that she could not

continue to work because of medical reasons.

The circuit court affirmed the VEC's determination that

- 2 - Webster left her job voluntarily without good cause because she

demonstrated no medical reason sufficient to compel her to

resign. We cannot say that the record as a whole necessarily

leads us to a different conclusion than that reached by the VEC.

Affirmed.

- 3 -