Besselaar v. State

466 So. 2d 202, 1985 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 4900
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedFebruary 26, 1985
Docket5 Div. 977
StatusPublished

This text of 466 So. 2d 202 (Besselaar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Besselaar v. State, 466 So. 2d 202, 1985 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 4900 (Ala. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

BOWEN, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus. Tracy Besselaar, an inmate in the Alabama Prison System, alleges that he was denied due process in an administrative disciplinary action taken on March 21, 1984. The District Attorney of Elmore County filed a motion to dismiss which addressed a separate disciplinary hearing held on August 2, 1984. The circuit court granted the State’s motion and dismissed the petition without a hearing.

The Attorney General admits that the petition was improperly dismissed.

The judgment of the circuit court dismissing the petition is reversed. This cause is remanded with directions that the merits of the petition be considered, together with any responsive pleading that may be filed by the State.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 So. 2d 202, 1985 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 4900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/besselaar-v-state-alacrimapp-1985.