Bess v. Reno
563 So. 2d 95, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2222, 1990 WL 37409
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 1990·No. No. 89-2289·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We find no error in a trial court refusing, in effect, to mandamus the state attorney to institute extradition proceedings to enforce a prior court order for bodily attachment issued in a post dissolution of marriage proceeding involving delinquent alimony and child support payments. See and compare Thompson v. Reno, 546 So.2d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), and Section 941.23(1), Florida Statutes, (1987). Therefore the matter under review is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bess v. Reno, 563 So. 2d 95, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2222, 1990 WL 37409 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
563 So. 2d 95 (Bess v. Reno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Detournay v. City of Coral Gables
127 So. 3d 869 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Sanders v. Laird
865 So. 2d 649 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)