Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bess v. Reno

Bess v. Reno

563 So. 2d 95, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2222, 1990 WL 37409
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 3, 1990
DocketNo. 89-2289
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 563 So. 2d 95 (Bess v. Reno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bess v. Reno, 563 So. 2d 95, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2222, 1990 WL 37409 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in a trial court refusing, in effect, to mandamus the state attorney to institute extradition proceedings to enforce a prior court order for bodily attachment issued in a post dissolution of marriage proceeding involving delinquent alimony and child support payments. See and compare Thompson v. Reno, 546 So.2d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), and Section 941.23(1), Florida Statutes, (1987). Therefore the matter under review is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Detournay v. City of Coral Gables
127 So. 3d 869 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Sanders v. Laird
865 So. 2d 649 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
563 So. 2d 95, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2222, 1990 WL 37409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bess-v-reno-fladistctapp-1990.