Besler v. United States

62 Cust. Ct. 1061

• Court: United States Customs Court
• Decided: January 13, 1969
• Docket: No. P69/10; protests 67/26820-4223, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/11; protests 67/51061, etc. (Mobile); No. P69/12; protests 67/79010, etc. (Baltimore); No. P69/13; protests 67/80811-5495,etc. (Chicago); No. P69/14; protests 68/31375-7835,etc. (Chicago); No. P69/15; protests 66/8164, etc. (Boston); No. P69/16; protests 67/62237, etc. (Boston); No. P69/17; protests 66/78386-2643, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/18; protests 66/77278-2841, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/19; protests 66/78623-3037, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/20; protests 67/26828-4232, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/21; protests 67/66707-5209, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/22; protests 68/7995-6486 and 68/8944-6563 (Chicago)
• Status: Published

Opinion

WatsoN, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers, trees, foliage, fruits, vegetables, grasses, or grains, and articles made of the foregoing, in chief value of plastic, assembled in the same manner as the merchandise the subject of Armbee Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and Zunold Trading Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.