Besherer v. Swisher

3 N.J.L. 748
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 15, 1811·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

— There is no question but that an action of trover may be brought for a bond, but the plaintiff must have an actual, or at least a special [*] property in the bond. If a man should pay off a bond which he had given to another, and neglect to take it up, we apprehend that he cannot bring an action of trover for this paid-off bond. If this was law, the fact of payment might be tried in an action of trover. We, think, therefore, that the judgment must be

Reversed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Besherer v. Swisher, 3 N.J.L. 748 (N.J. 1811).

3 N.J.L. 748 (Besherer v. Swisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cargill Global Trading v. APPLIED DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
706 F. Supp. 2d 563 (D. New Jersey, 2010)