Beshara v. Ely & Walker D. G. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Beshara v. Ely & Walker D. G. Co.

1923 OK 673, 218 P. 798, 92 Okla. 224, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 842

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 25, 1923·No. 11927·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

STEPHENSON, C.

The plaintiffs commenced their action in the district court of Muskogee county for the cancellation of a judgment and for damages against the defendant. In the trial of the cause judgment went for the defendant, and the plaintiffs have brought error to this court. This cause was regularly assigned and submitted with notice to the attorneys for the respective parties to prepare, serve, and file briefs. The plaintiff in error has failed to file and serve brief as required by the rules of this court. Therefore it is recommended that this cause be dismissed for want of prosecution.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

STEPHENSON, C.

The plaintiffs commenced their action in the district court of Muskogee county for the cancellation of a judgment and for damages against the defendant. In the trial of the cause judgment went for the defendant, and the plaintiffs have brought error to this court. This cause was regularly assigned and submitted with notice to the attorneys for the respective parties to prepare, serve, and file briefs. The plaintiff in error has failed to file and serve brief as required by the rules of this court. Therefore it is recommended that this cause be dismissed for want of prosecution.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Beshara v. Ely & Walker D. G. Co., 1923 OK 673, 218 P. 798, 92 Okla. 224, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 842 (Okla. 1923).

Pincite

1923 OK 673 (Beshara v. Ely & Walker D. G. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.