BES Med. Supply, Inc. v. MVAIC
Opinion
against
MVAIC, Appellant.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Ingrid Joseph, J.), entered September 13, 2013. The order denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (sued herein as MVAIC) appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Since plaintiff and its assignor were aware of the identity of the owner of the vehicle which had struck the vehicle in which the assignor was a passenger, plaintiff, as assignee, was required to exhaust its remedies against the vehicle's owner before seeking relief from MVAIC (see Hauswirth v American Home Assur. Co., 244 AD2d 528 [1997]; Modern Art Med., P.C. v MVAIC, 22 Misc 3d 126[A], 2008 NY Slip Op 52586[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2008]; Doctor Liliya Med., P.C. v MVAIC, 21 Misc 3d 143[A], 2008 NY Slip Op 52453[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2008]). Here, plaintiff did not demonstrate that it had exhausted its remedies against the owner of the vehicle.
Accordingly, the order is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.
Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: September 27, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
BES Med. Supply, Inc. v. MVAIC (BES Med. Supply, Inc. v. MVAIC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.