Berzins v. Berzins
10 A.3d 521, 299 Conn. 904, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 428
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Berzins v. Berzins. Read the opinion of the Court — 289 Conn. 932 →
Opinion
The substitute defendant administrator’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 122 Conn. App. 674 (AC 30946), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the Appellate Court properly affirmed the trial court’s decision to order the substitute defendant administrator to pay the attorney’s fees of the plaintiff pursuant to Ramin v. Ramin, 281 Conn. 324, 915 A.2d 790 (2007)?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Berzins v. Berzins, 10 A.3d 521, 299 Conn. 904, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 428 (Colo. 2010).
10 A.3d 521 (Berzins v. Berzins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ramin v. Ramin
915 A.2d 790 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2007)
Berzins v. Berzins
998 A.2d 1265 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)