Berzins v. Berzins
10 A.3d 521, 299 Conn. 904, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 428
This text of 10 A.3d 521 (Berzins v. Berzins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Berzins v. Berzins, 10 A.3d 521, 299 Conn. 904, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 428 (Colo. 2010).
Opinion
The substitute defendant administrator’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 122 Conn. App. 674 (AC 30946), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the Appellate Court properly affirmed the trial court’s decision to order the substitute defendant administrator to pay the attorney’s fees of the plaintiff pursuant to Ramin v. Ramin, 281 Conn. 324, 915 A.2d 790 (2007)?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ramin v. Ramin
915 A.2d 790 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2007)
Berzins v. Berzins
998 A.2d 1265 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 A.3d 521, 299 Conn. 904, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berzins-v-berzins-conn-2010.