Bertrand Vs. Rodriguez
This text of 482 P.3d 697 (Bertrand Vs. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARIA ANTONIA BERTRAND, No. 82586 Appellant, VS. MARIO HERRERA RODRIGUEZ, FILED Respondent. MAR 2 2 2021 EUZI,Et.E-7 . 9;'.1‘314 CLE OF r PK:Mi.: COURT BY ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPLF CLC'RK
This appeal was docketed on March 5, 2021, without payment of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(e). That same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 10 days. The notice advised that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2). It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN
BY:
cc: Hon. Stacy Michelle Rocheleau, District Judge, Family Court Division Maria Antonia Bertrand Mario Herrera Rodriguez Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER
lo).iv47
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
482 P.3d 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bertrand-vs-rodriguez-nev-2021.