Bertrand v. G-Force Transportation, L.L.C.
This text of 134 So. 3d 1165 (Bertrand v. G-Force Transportation, L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re G-Force Transportation, L.L.C.;— Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Lafayette, Office of Worker’s Compensation # 4, No. 13-03526; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. WCW 13-01035.
Granted. A party generally may obtain discovery of any information which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action. La.Code Civ. P. art. 1422; Stolzle v. Safety & Systems Assurance Consultants, Inc., 02-1197 (La.5/24/02), 819 So.2d 287. Many of claimant’s discovery requests have little relevance to the subject matter of his claim. Accordingly, the judgment of the Office of Workers’ Compensation compelling relator to answer all the requested discovery is vacated. The case remanded to the Office of Workers’ Compensation, which is instructed to review the discovery requests and compel relator to answer only those discovery requests relevant to the subject matter of the claim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 So. 3d 1165, 2014 WL 1272386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bertrand-v-g-force-transportation-llc-la-2014.