Bertrand v. G-Force Transportation, L.L.C.

134 So. 3d 1165, 2014 WL 1272386
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 21, 2014·No. No. 2013-CC-2944·Published

Opinion

In re G-Force Transportation, L.L.C.;— Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Lafayette, Office of Worker’s Compensation # 4, No. 13-03526; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. WCW 13-01035.

Granted. A party generally may obtain discovery of any information which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action. La.Code Civ. P. art. 1422; Stolzle v. Safety & Systems Assurance Consultants, Inc., 02-1197 (La.5/24/02), 819 So.2d 287. Many of claimant’s discovery requests have little relevance to the subject matter of his claim. Accordingly, the judgment of the Office of Workers’ Compensation compelling relator to answer all the requested discovery is vacated. The case remanded to the Office of Workers’ Compensation, which is instructed to review the discovery requests and compel relator to answer only those discovery requests relevant to the subject matter of the claim.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bertrand v. G-Force Transportation, L.L.C., 134 So. 3d 1165, 2014 WL 1272386 (La. 2014).

134 So. 3d 1165 (Bertrand v. G-Force Transportation, L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stolzle v. Safety & Systems Assurance Consultants, Inc.
819 So. 2d 287 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2002)