Bertrand v. Bertrand

828 So. 2d 436, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14556, 2002 WL 31251701
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 9, 2002
DocketNo. 3D02-935
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 828 So. 2d 436 (Bertrand v. Bertrand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bertrand v. Bertrand, 828 So. 2d 436, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14556, 2002 WL 31251701 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Gerald C. Bertrand, the former husband, appeals the denial of his Motion for Reconsideration of Final Judgment. We dismiss his appeal as untimely. Pursuant to rule 9.110(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure (2001), a notice of appeal must be filed with the clerk of the lower tribunal within 30 days of rendition of the order to be reviewed. In this case, the Second Amended Final Judgment in [437]*437the Bertrands’ dissolution of marriage was entered on November 15, 2000. Mr. Bertrand filed a motion for rehearing on December 7, 2000. The motion was denied on December 21, 2000. Mr. Bertrand filed his notice of appeal on April 2, 2002, almost sixteen months after his motion for rehearing was first denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. Narkiewicz
834 So. 2d 257 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
828 So. 2d 436, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14556, 2002 WL 31251701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bertrand-v-bertrand-fladistctapp-2002.