Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bertran v. State

Bertran v. State

870 So. 2d 915, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5478, 2004 WL 840280
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 21, 2004
DocketNo. 03-2868
StatusPublished

This text of 870 So. 2d 915 (Bertran v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bertran v. State, 870 So. 2d 915, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5478, 2004 WL 840280 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The cause is remanded and the trial court is directed to vacate its order of revocation of probation and to enter a written order which conforms to its oral pronouncements. See Jefferson v. State, 732 So.2d 408 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Cushion v. State, 637 So.2d 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Bertrán need not be present. See Baldwin v. State, 855 So.2d 1180 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jefferson v. State
732 So. 2d 408 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Cushion v. State
637 So. 2d 2 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Baldwin v. State
855 So. 2d 1180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
870 So. 2d 915, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5478, 2004 WL 840280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bertran-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.