Bertram v. State

884 So. 2d 896, 2004 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 25, 2004 WL 179189
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bertram v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 323
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided January 30, 2004·No. CR-00-2277·Published

Opinions

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

BASCHAB, Judge.

In accordance with the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion in Ex parte Bertram, 884 So.2d 889 (Ala.2003), we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand this case to the trial court for proceedings that are consistent with that opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

McMILLAN, P.J., and SHAW, J., concur; WISE, J., concurs specially, with opinion, which COBB, J., joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bertram v. State, 884 So. 2d 896, 2004 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 25, 2004 WL 179189 (Ala. Ct. App. 2004).

884 So. 2d 896 (Bertram v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. City of Huntsville
259 So. 2d 288 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1972)
Ex Parte Bertram
884 So. 2d 889 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2003)
Ex Parte Parker
740 So. 2d 432 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1999)
State v. Rea
865 S.W.2d 923 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, 1992)