Bertram v. State

884 So. 2d 896, 2004 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 25, 2004 WL 179189
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 30, 2004
DocketCR-00-2277
StatusPublished

This text of 884 So. 2d 896 (Bertram v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bertram v. State, 884 So. 2d 896, 2004 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 25, 2004 WL 179189 (Ala. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinions

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

BASCHAB, Judge.

In accordance with the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion in Ex parte Bertram, 884 So.2d 889 (Ala.2003), we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand this case to the trial court for proceedings that are consistent with that opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

McMILLAN, P.J., and SHAW, J., concur; WISE, J., concurs specially, with opinion, which COBB, J., joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. City of Huntsville
259 So. 2d 288 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1972)
Ex Parte Bertram
884 So. 2d 889 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2003)
Ex Parte Parker
740 So. 2d 432 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1999)
State v. Rea
865 S.W.2d 923 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
884 So. 2d 896, 2004 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 25, 2004 WL 179189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bertram-v-state-alacrimapp-2004.