Bertram v. EXCELLENCE IN MISSOURI FOUNDATION

348 S.W.3d 831, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1245, 2011 WL 4373994
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 20, 2011·No. ED 96373·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant Donald Bertram (“Claimant”) appeals from the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) finding that Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because he committed misconduct connected with work as defined by section 288.030.1(23). Claimant asserts that the award of the Commission was not based on sufficient competent evidence in the record.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bertram v. EXCELLENCE IN MISSOURI FOUNDATION, 348 S.W.3d 831, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1245, 2011 WL 4373994 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

348 S.W.3d 831 (Bertram v. EXCELLENCE IN MISSOURI FOUNDATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howard v. Southeast Missouri Hospital
348 S.W.3d 831 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)