Bertram B. Wallace v. United States

421 F.2d 1390
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 8, 1969
Docket26022
StatusPublished

This text of 421 F.2d 1390 (Bertram B. Wallace v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bertram B. Wallace v. United States, 421 F.2d 1390 (5th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant received two five year consecutive sentences after having been found guilty of violating Title 26, U.S.C.,' Secs. 4704(a) and 4705(a). This case has been held in abeyance awaiting decision by the Supreme Court of the Minor case cited below. That Court determined in Minor v. United States, 396 U.S. 87, 90 S.Ct. 284, 24 L.Ed.2d 283 (decided December 8, 1969), that the statutory obligation to sell only in pursuance of an official order form did not violate the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.

The petitioner’s only other contention is that he was denied due process because there was a four month delay between the commission of the crime and the time of arrest. The contention is without merit. United States v. Grayson, 5 Cir. 1969, 416 F.2d 1073. Accordingly the denial of the petitioner’s petition for habeas corpus is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Minor v. United States
396 U.S. 87 (Supreme Court, 1969)
United States v. Sidney A. Grayson
416 F.2d 1073 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
421 F.2d 1390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bertram-b-wallace-v-united-states-ca5-1969.